Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Technology and Diagnosis

First of all, I would be uncomfortable, to say the least, to convey that I think the biggest fish to fry in getting a healthier nation is the advancement of technology. Is it important? Yes, and very beneficial, but our biggest problems we bring upon ourselves. If we could get more people to say "where's the gym" versus "supersize me", we could curb many of our ills. As others have pointed out, technology can really be a two edged sword. Now, instead of eating right and exercising, people seem to be more willing to pop a pill to control their blood pressure, or 10mg of a statin drug to lower their cholesterol, etc. etc. But since we're asked to keep this to technology, and many other excellent concepts have already been discussed, let me suggest that perhaps we could develop better diagnostic tools and software. I watch a LOT of "Mystery Diagnosis" types shows, documentaries, etc. and I'm amazed at how many times people go undiagnosed or misdiagnosed, sometimes for years. Needlessly suffering both physically and financially, and having endless trips to the E.R. And then finally, through some series of events, another doctor sees the symptoms and immediately recognizes what the problem is. And these aren't always just rare and difficult conditions to diagnose. Perhaps a comprehensive, collaborative software effort could be made to create better diagnostic tools. Let me put it this way - if you can think it, it can go into a computer and have decision making software guide you into possible diagnoses, or at least different ways of thinking. I'm not suggesting this is a replacement for having a doctor diagnose an issue, but it could, over years, evolve to be a great tool. But no one single entity could really provide this - I think it would have to be a large scale collabarative effort. Perhaps that, and not the technology, is the biggest hurdle. As I inferred (and countless others have for generations) before: man's greatest enemy is himself.

3 comments:

  1. I think the comprehensive software diagnosis system could be a good tool as you suggested, but I also agree that this should not replace the doctor. Sometimes symptoms of diseases can be very similar or even the same and we need the human mind to be able to reason through things in ways that a computer is not capable of. However, it still holds true that we are only human and we do make mistakes. I do think this software would be a great help in diagnosing diseases correctly earlier which could lead to better quality care for the patient and less money spent on unnecessary treatments.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I completely agree with the idea of a large scale collabarative effort to create a database of symptoms, diseases, and health conditions that is entirely inclusive of every piece of knowledge we know.

    Although as Sabrina had mentioned, it doesn't replace a doctor's opinion. BUT it does provide a good source of information. I too watch Mystery Diagnosis... and almost always, the diagnosis is found in a book that most doctor's don't really even bother to look in much during their professional lives. But if they had easier access to the information, they would probably be more willing to consult it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great idea to create a database of health conditions. Having details of the numerous kinds of illnesses out there will make identifying what someones has easier, should anyway. Software diagnoses system could be a good tool, but again like you said, and I agree that it should not replace the doctor. It should just be a tool to help guide the doctor in a quicker way identifying symptoms.

    ReplyDelete